To read this content please select one of the options below:

The impact of US biofuel policies on agricultural price levels and volatility

Bruce A. Babcock (Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA)

China Agricultural Economic Review

ISSN: 1756-137X

Article publication date: 16 November 2012

2741

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to examine the market impacts of US biofuels and biofuel policies.

Design/methodology/approach

Two methods of analysis are employed. The first method looks back in time and estimates what US crop prices would have been during the 2005 to 2009 marketing years under two scenarios. The second method of analysis is forward looking and examines the market impacts of the blender tax credit and mandate on the distribution of prices in the 2011 calendar and marketing year.

Findings

The results developed in the previous two sections show that US ethanol policies modestly increased maize prices from 2006 to 2009 and that market impacts of the policies will be larger under tighter market conditions.

Practical implications

More flexible US biofuel policy including removing the blenders tax credit, which does not help US biofuel industry as long as the mandates are in place, and relaxing blending mandates when feedstock supplies are low.

Originality/value

This report makes three contributions to understanding the extent to which US biofuel policies contribute to higher agricultural and food prices. First, estimates of the impact of US ethanol policies on crop and food prices reveal that the impacts of the subsidies were quite modest. The second contribution is to provide estimates of the impact on agricultural commodity prices and food prices from market‐driven expansion of ethanol. The final contribution of this report is improved insight into how current US biofuel policies are expected to affect crop prices in the near future.

Keywords

Citation

Babcock, B.A. (2012), "The impact of US biofuel policies on agricultural price levels and volatility", China Agricultural Economic Review, Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 407-426. https://doi.org/10.1108/17561371211284786

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2012, Authors

Related articles