To read this content please select one of the options below:

Telecare, telehealth and assistive technologies — do we know what we're talking about?

Kevin Doughty (Advanced Telecare Users Group, Centre for Usable Home Technologies (CUHTec))
Andrew Monk (Advanced Telecare Users Group, Centre for Usable Home Technologies (CUHTec))
Carole Bayliss (Advanced Telecare Users Group, Centre for Usable Home Technologies (CUHTec))
Sian Brown (Advanced Telecare Users Group, Centre for Usable Home Technologies (CUHTec))
Lena Dewsbury (Advanced Telecare Users Group, Centre for Usable Home Technologies (CUHTec))
Barbara Dunk (Advanced Telecare Users Group, Centre for Usable Home Technologies (CUHTec))
Vance Gallagher (Advanced Telecare Users Group, Centre for Usable Home Technologies (CUHTec))
Kathy Grafham (Advanced Telecare Users Group, Centre for Usable Home Technologies (CUHTec))
Martin Jones (Advanced Telecare Users Group, Centre for Usable Home Technologies (CUHTec))
Charles Lowe (Advanced Telecare Users Group, Centre for Usable Home Technologies (CUHTec))
Lynne McAlister (Advanced Telecare Users Group, Centre for Usable Home Technologies (CUHTec))
Kevin McSorley (Advanced Telecare Users Group, Centre for Usable Home Technologies (CUHTec))
Pam Mills (Advanced Telecare Users Group, Centre for Usable Home Technologies (CUHTec))
Clare Skidmore (Advanced Telecare Users Group, Centre for Usable Home Technologies (CUHTec))
Aileen Stewart (Advanced Telecare Users Group, Centre for Usable Home Technologies (CUHTec))
Barbara Taylor (Advanced Telecare Users Group, Centre for Usable Home Technologies (CUHTec))
David Ward (Advanced Telecare Users Group, Centre for Usable Home Technologies (CUHTec))

Journal of Assistive Technologies

ISSN: 1754-9450

Article publication date: 1 December 2007

397

Abstract

The development of telecare services across the UK has been supported by grants from the respective governments of Scotland and Wales, and by the DH in England. New services are being established to sometimes operate alongside existing community equipment services and community alarm services. Elsewhere they are embracing a wider range of services including rehabilitation, intermediate care and health services designed to reduce the use of unscheduled care services. This paper discusses the difficulties in understanding the scope of telecare services, and the definitions of services that will need to be confirmed so that service users can choose appropriately if offered direct payments. Two different service models are offered, one of which uses telehealth as an umbrella term to cover all telecare, e‐care and m‐care, and telemedicine where the former includes all such services offered in the service user's home, including those of a medical nature. The second model views telecare alongside assistive technologies and telemedicine as one of three different technology groups designed to make people more independent or to bring care closer to home. There is significant overlap between the three groups, which justifies the introduction of a new term ‐ ARTS (assistive and remote technology services) ‐ to describe this area of support.

Keywords

Citation

Doughty, K., Monk, A., Bayliss, C., Brown, S., Dewsbury, L., Dunk, B., Gallagher, V., Grafham, K., Jones, M., Lowe, C., McAlister, L., McSorley, K., Mills, P., Skidmore, C., Stewart, A., Taylor, B. and Ward, D. (2007), "Telecare, telehealth and assistive technologies — do we know what we're talking about?", Journal of Assistive Technologies, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 6-10. https://doi.org/10.1108/17549450200700012

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2007, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles