Alternation of legislation of foreign investment in China: Response to legislation cooperation of international investment

Abstract

Purpose –This paper seeks to assess the extent to which China has both encouraged and achieved growth through foreign investment. Design/methodology/approach – This paper provides an examination of the incentives developed and deployed and seeks to assess evidence of their performance. Findings – “Market Economic” development of legislation of foreign investment in China has significant meanings toward promotion of Chinese economy. Since the basic policies of reform and opening coming into force in China in 1970s, China has adopted the opening, welcoming and incentive attitudes for foreign investment, making the positive activities acclimating to economic development rules to achieve the win‐win results all around the world. Investment in China by foreign investors has been initially carried out by “enterprises with foreign investment”, which always turned out to be the cooperative or independent direct investment basing on the funds. During the recent years, China has become the second country (only behind of USA) which absorbs the most direct foreign investment in the world. FDI has played an important role in the Chinese economic development. Correspondingly, the legislation for foreign investment in China has gradually been improved and perfected and has protected and enhanced the foreign investment and economic development. Viewing the alternation of legislation of foreign investment in China, it has fully embodied the corresponding to the global and regional international investment legislation cooperation. Originality/value – This study will be of interest to those seeking an “insider's” view on the success or otherwise of foreign direct investment strategies in China.

Citation

Ben, L. (2009), "Alternation of legislation of foreign investment in China: Response to legislation cooperation of international investment", International Journal of Law and Management, Vol. 51 No. 4, pp. 220-225. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542430910974040