To read this content please select one of the options below:

Meaningfulness‐making at work

Timo Vuori (Department of Management and Organisation, Hanken School of Economics, Helsinki, Finland)
Elina San (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland)
Mari Kira (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland)

Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management

ISSN: 1746-5648

Article publication date: 17 August 2012

4002

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to increase understanding of the ways workers can actively make their own work experiences more meaningful.

Design/methodology/approach

The data consist of 29 interviews with people from three professions. The authors analyzed the interviews by coding the statements into first‐ and second‐order categories, and then aggregating them into theoretical constructs; and by recognizing relations between the constructs.

Findings

Workers try to increase the proportion of positive cues extracted from work to make their work more meaningful. The three main tactics for increasing the proportion of positive cues are cognitively emphasizing the positive qualities of work, developing competencies to be better able to produce positive outcomes and positive reactions from others, and influencing the work content.

Research limitations/implications

This model provides a preliminary understanding of meaningfulness‐making, based on cross‐sectional interview data. Future research should use alternative methods, and verify and elaborate the findings.

Practical implications

Managers can promote workers’ sense of meaningfulness by coaching and enabling meaningfulness‐making tactics identified in this paper.

Originality/value

This paper presents alternative ways to achieve work meaningfulness that complement the previously recognized job crafting and sensemaking routes.

Keywords

Citation

Vuori, T., San, E. and Kira, M. (2012), "Meaningfulness‐making at work", Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 231-248. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465641211253110

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2012, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles