To read this content please select one of the options below:

Multi‐criteria supply chain performance evaluation: An Indian chemical industry case study

Omkarprasad Vaidya (Operations Management and Quantitative Techniques Group, Indian Institute of Management Raipur, Raipur, India)
Manoj Hudnurkar (Symbiosis Center for Management and HRD, Hinjewadi, Pune, India)

International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management

ISSN: 1741-0401

Article publication date: 8 March 2013

2307

Abstract

Purpose

Understanding the significance of supply chain, demands need of multiple criteria for its performance evaluation. The aim of this paper is to propose an approach to evaluate the performance of supply chain using multiple criteria.

Design/methodology/approach

A multi‐criteria decision making tool, like analytic hierarchy process is used to develop an eight step methodology for performance evaluation. The proposed methodology is also elucidated with an illustration and a case from Indian chemical company.

Findings

Supply chain performance number is computed, suggesting the present performance status of the supply chain. The methodology also helps rank the various links according to its performance. The analysis leads in computation of supply chain performance number (SCPN): the value lies between 0 and 1.

Research limitations/implications

The methodology can be suitably modified to accommodate any number of criteria and supply links, given the structure of the supply chain.

Practical implications

A case from an Indian chemical industry is presented in this paper. The findings of which, are encouraging and have benefited the practicing mangers in various ways.

Originality/value

This paper presents a unique approach for supply chain performance evaluation considering multiple criteria, with a flexibility to modify and analyze using the available data sets.

Keywords

Citation

Vaidya, O. and Hudnurkar, M. (2013), "Multi‐criteria supply chain performance evaluation: An Indian chemical industry case study", International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 62 No. 3, pp. 293-316. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410401311309195

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2013, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles