To read this content please select one of the options below:

Organisational self‐assessment and the adoption of managerial innovations

T.F. Burgess (Leeds University Business School, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK)
N.E. Shaw (Leeds University Business School, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK)
C. de Mattos (Business School, Aston University, Birmingham, UK)

International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management

ISSN: 1741-0401

Article publication date: 1 March 2005

4668

Abstract

Purpose

This paper investigates manager's use of self‐assessment in diagnostic routines to assist organisations embarking on major organisational change involving the adoption of a managerial innovation.

Design/methodology/approach

The illustrative case focuses on the comparative adoption of two assessment tools set within a methodology developed via action research to improve the performance of new process development in the specialty chemical industry.

Findings

Features of the case context, such as prior commitment to the methodology, contribute to explaining managerial preferences for the non‐financial diagnostic tool over the financial one.

Practical implications

For practitioners the case illustrates how prior commitment can obscure rational considerations when faced with planning and implementing major change, particularly so when introducing managerial innovations. For academics the case study highlights the potential for fruitful research into the design and use of self‐assessment routines that precede or coincide with the adoption and implementation of such managerial innovations.

Originality/value

The paper focuses on self‐assessment routines constructed to aid chemical firms contemplating the adoption of a major managerial innovation; a methodology that entails a radical approach to designing and developing new manufacturing processes for chemical production.

Keywords

Citation

Burgess, T.F., Shaw, N.E. and de Mattos, C. (2005), "Organisational self‐assessment and the adoption of managerial innovations", International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 54 No. 2, pp. 98-112. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400510576603

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2005, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles