To read this content please select one of the options below:

Cost performance of simple priority rule combinations

Samir Barman (Division of Marketing and Supply Chain Management, Michael F. Price College of Business, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA)
Joao V. Lisboa (School of Economics, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal)

Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management

ISSN: 1741-038X

Article publication date: 8 June 2010

534

Abstract

Purpose

Several prior studies have investigated the strategy of concurrently deploying different priority rules at different processing stages of a manufacturing system. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the advantage of using such a strategy over that of using priority rules in their pure forms.

Design/methodology/approach

Three priority rules were combined in all possible ways in a simulated, three‐stage, flow‐dominated manufacturing system. The performances of these combinations, along with three other simple priority rules in their pure forms, were compared using both mean and variability in waiting, earliness, tardiness, and total costs under two shop load levels and several tardiness to earliness cost ratios.

Findings

The results indicate that the combinations between SIX and shortest processing time (SPT) rules perform well in reducing both mean and variability of waiting cost but do poorly on tardiness cost. On the other hand, the due date rule in its pure form or in conjunction with SIX or SPT is effective in reducing both mean and variability of both earliness and tardiness costs. While tardiness cost appears to dominate the total cost data, the shop load level registered little impact on the performance of the combination schemes.

Research limitations/implications

The results of the paper have useful practical implications for textile and ceramic industries. However, the conclusions are limited to the cost structure used, although a wide range of cost ratios is included.

Originality/value

The paper offers insights into whether throughput and due date‐related costs can be reduced by using a job sequencing strategy that simultaneously deploys different priority rules at different processing stages of a manufacturing environment.

Keywords

Citation

Barman, S. and Lisboa, J.V. (2010), "Cost performance of simple priority rule combinations", Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. 21 No. 5, pp. 567-584. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410381011046977

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2010, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles