To read this content please select one of the options below:

In Rule 12b‐1 overhaul, SEC proposes dramatic changes to mutual fund distribution arrangements

Nathan J. Greene (Partner, Shearman & Sterling LLP, New York, New York, USA)

Journal of Investment Compliance

ISSN: 1528-5812

Article publication date: 23 November 2010

123

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to explain the SEC's proposal to establish a new framework for mutual fund distribution charges by replacing Rule 12b‐1 with a new Rule 12b‐2 combined with an amended Rule 6c‐10.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper discusses the background of ongoing distribution charges permitted under Rule 12b‐1; explains the SEC's proposal to establish a hard cap to the percentage rate of the charges that can be deducted from funds over time and to require fund boards of directors to make annual determinations of the reasonableness, fairness, and effectiveness of front‐end sales loads and ongoing sales charges; provides a summary of the new cap; explains the proposed disclosure changes, fee externalization alternative, and timetable and compliance dates; discusses various commercial and legal issues to consider in light of the proposal.

Findings

Long uncomfortable with a registered mutual fund's use of its own assets to pay for the distribution of its shares, the SEC is proposing a completely new approach.

Originality/value

The paper provides expert guidance from experienced financial services lawyers.

Keywords

Citation

Greene, N.J. (2010), "In Rule 12b‐1 overhaul, SEC proposes dramatic changes to mutual fund distribution arrangements", Journal of Investment Compliance, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 51-55. https://doi.org/10.1108/15285811011098983

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2010, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles