To read this content please select one of the options below:

Who should pay for e‐discovery? Examining the Zubulake Approach

Peter J. Beshar (Partner, Co‐Chair Securities Litigation Department, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, New York, USA; pbeshar@gibsondunn.com)
Michael J. Passante (Litigation Associate, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, New York, USA; mpassante@gibsondunn.com)

Journal of Investment Compliance

ISSN: 1528-5812

Article publication date: 1 January 2004

73

Abstract

For over two hundred years, our nation’s legal system has been based on the “American Rule” ‐ with each party bearing its own litigation costs. As the Supreme Court noted in 1975, this distinctly American tradition is “deeply rooted in our history and in congressional policy, and it is not for us to invade the legislature’s province by redistributing litigation costs…” Not surprisingly, the founders of our legal system did not anticipate the extent to which e‐mail would come to dominate our professional and personal lives. Experts estimate that 30 billion e‐mail messages are currently are being sent every day ‐ or an average of five e‐mails per day for every person on the planet.

Keywords

Citation

Beshar, P.J. and Passante, M.J. (2004), "Who should pay for e‐discovery? Examining the Zubulake Approach", Journal of Investment Compliance, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 7-12. https://doi.org/10.1108/15285810410636037

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2004, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles