Risk premia in CO2 allowances: spot and futures prices in the EEX market
Abstract
Purpose
This paper seeks to analyze stylized statistical properties of the recent traded asset CO2 emission allowances, for spot and futures returns, examining also the relation linking convenience yield and risk premium, for the German European Energy Exchange (EEX) between October 2005 and October 2009.
Design/methodology/approach
The study was conducted through empirical estimations of CO2 allowances risk premium, convenience yield, and their relationships.
Findings
Future prices from an ex-post perspective are examined to show evidence for significant negative risk premium, or a positive forward premium. A positive relationship between risk premium and time-to-maturity is found. Both financial concepts are found to be negatively affected by spot price volatility. Convenience yield is positively influenced by CO2 price, while influencing the risk premium positively.
Practical implications
From a financial perspective, allowances seem to be producing the desired effects in terms of environmental policies, although a lot more remains to be done. The presence of risk premium and convenience yield makes it clear that agents act in this commodity market according to risk consideration. Results change depending on phase and futures contracts used for the determination of both financial terms, indicating that uncertainties over the future of EU-ETS seem to be decreasing.
Originality/value
Previous research has mainly focused on the first phase of the EU-ETS (2005-2007), whereas this paper extends the analysis period here. The paper finds some opposite results compared with previous commodities theories and designs some policy implications, given the results attained.
Keywords
Acknowledgements
This research has been supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) (Grant number SFRH/BD/19948/2004).
Citation
Madaleno, M. and Pinho, C. (2011), "Risk premia in CO2 allowances: spot and futures prices in the EEX market", Management of Environmental Quality, Vol. 22 No. 5, pp. 550-565. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777831111159699
Publisher
:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2011, Emerald Group Publishing Limited