To read this content please select one of the options below:

Social values and healthcare priority setting in Korea

Jeonghoon Ahn (Office of Health Services Research, National Evidence‐based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (NECA), Seoul, Korea)
Gaeun Kim (Office of Research Planning, National Evidence‐based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (NECA), Seoul, Korea)
Hae Sun Suh (National Evidence‐based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (NECA), Seoul, Korea and College of Pharmacy, Yonsei Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Yonsei University, Incheon, Korea)
Sang Moo Lee (Center for New Health Technology Assessment, National Evidence‐based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (NECA), Seoul, Korea )

Journal of Health Organization and Management

ISSN: 1477-7266

Article publication date: 15 June 2012

1029

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to present the role of social values in setting healthcare priorities in Korea.

Design/methodology/approach

Using Clark and Weale's draft framework, Korean healthcare priority setting was analysed. The process values used were transparency, accountability, and participation, and the content values used were clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness, justice/equity, solidarity and autonomy.

Findings

In the Korean health priority setting, it was found that multiple factors influence the decision‐making process. Effectiveness and safety are the two most important values mentioned in the process. Cost‐effectiveness is also considered in reimbursement decisions for new drugs since 2007. Recently, health technology assessment (HTA) has begun to change the social value system traditionally used in the Korean healthcare priority setting.

Originality/value

The paper extends understanding of health priority setting in Korea, and how the interpretation and use of social values has changed over recent years.

Keywords

Citation

Ahn, J., Kim, G., Sun Suh, H. and Moo Lee, S. (2012), "Social values and healthcare priority setting in Korea", Journal of Health Organization and Management, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 343-350. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777261211238981

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2012, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles