To read this content please select one of the options below:

Delivering minimalist workplaces that improve corporate agility

Stephen Bradley (AMA Alexi Marmot Associates, Linton House, 39 Highgate Road, London NW5 1RS, UK; Tel: +44 (0)20 7284 5888; Fax: +44 (0)20 7284 5889; E‐mail: Stephen.Bradley@aleximarmot.com)
Christopher Hood (a US‐based architect and senior workplace manager at Hewlett‐Packard)

Journal of Facilities Management

ISSN: 1472-5967

Article publication date: 1 January 2003

780

Abstract

Unwarranted allocation of personal space and the accumulation of personal ‘stuff’ can become impediments to business agility, turning conventional offices into ‘millstones’ which suppress an organisation’s ability to change direction smartly in the face of new competition and other business forces. Workplace design needs to cater for perpetual change of occupancy, organisation, work processes and messages about the business. Tangible assets should be dynamic, adaptable and even portable. Setting aside arguments in favour of ‘showpiece’ corporate headquarters, this paper advocates that what is needed to help business units to stay competitive is a ‘minimalist workspace’ ‐ kept free of ‘stuff’ that clutters and impedes quick and inexpensive adaptation to local needs, every few months rather than every few years. The minimalist workplace does not need to be bland or impersonal. Imaginative design and minute attention to detail of the physical environment and the tools, technology and support services can produce attractive and ‘liveable’ environments which can successfully accommodate personal preference and promote a sense of belonging as well as mobility. This paper outlines four ‘golden rules’ for best practice in the minimalist workplace, demanding more proactive space management and more intelligent real estate design and specification to cater for greater utilisation of facilities.

Keywords

Citation

Bradley, S. and Hood, C. (2003), "Delivering minimalist workplaces that improve corporate agility", Journal of Facilities Management, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 68-84. https://doi.org/10.1108/14725960410808122

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 2003, MCB UP Limited

Related articles