To read this content please select one of the options below:

The Chihuahua sustainability practice: lots of shivering but no real action. Practical sustainability acceptance is low in German and New Zealand firms

Jens Mueller (Associate Professor for Entrepreneurship and Strategy at the University of Waikato Management School, Hamilton, New Zealand.)
Heinz Klandt (Foundation Professor for Entrepreneurship at the European Business School, International University, Oestrich‐Winkel, Germany.)
Gael McDonald (Professor of Business Ethics at Unitec New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand.)
Tanja Finke‐Schuermann (Based at the Institute for Empirical Research into Business Establishment and Organization (bifego), European Business School, Oestrich‐Winkel, Germany.)

Corporate Governance

ISSN: 1472-0701

Article publication date: 19 June 2007

820

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to describe the extent to which corporate organizations in Germany and in New Zealand have included sustainability practices as part of their strategic planning process.

Design/methodology/approach

Current literature is reviewed to make a case for sustainability to be a driver behind corporate decision making and long‐term performance. The results of surveys of several hundred firms in both Germany and New Zealand, countries with a publicly stated commitment to sustainability, are reviewed to compare the adoption rates of sustainability practices.

Findings

There is a significant difference between what firms do and what their managers think is important. Managers largely consider sustainability practices an important factor for their future careers, while firms to a large extent do not include sustainability as part of their strategic or operational planning process.

Research limitations/implications

The International Sustainability Acceptance Measurement (ISAM) collects data in several countries through local‐language versions of the same online survey tool (www.worldreply.com). The findings in this report are specific only to New Zealand and Germany.

Practical implications

The paper points academics, corporate executives and sustainability fanatics to an alarming inconsistency between what is publicly reported as commitment to sustainability and what is practically achieved.

Originality/value

This paper adds value to the discussion of how sustainability practices have migrated into the operation of firms.

Keywords

Citation

Mueller, J., Klandt, H., McDonald, G. and Finke‐Schuermann, T. (2007), "The Chihuahua sustainability practice: lots of shivering but no real action. Practical sustainability acceptance is low in German and New Zealand firms", Corporate Governance, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 227-237. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700710756517

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2007, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles