To read this content please select one of the options below:

Breakthrough board performance: how to harness your board’s intellectual capital[1]

Gavin J. Nicholson (Gavin Nicholson is joint managing director of Competitive Dynamics Pty Ltd. He has been a manager in the hospitality sector and has extensive consulting experience in work force profiling projects. In his specialty of corporate governance, Gavin has consulted to national research companies, government owned corporations, not‐for‐profit organisations, statutory authorities and several large Australian public companies. He is currently undertaking a PhD on the strategic impact of corporate governance. He is the co‐author of Boards that Work: A New Guide for Directors.)
Geoffrey C. Kiel (Geoffrey Kiel is Professor of Management at the University of Queensland. He has had an extensive career as a management consultant, senior manager, management educator and academic researcher. He has been published in journals such as the Journal of Marketing Research, Business Horizons and the European Journal of Marketing. His current research focuses on corporate governance and he is the co‐author of the major Australian practical guide to governance Boards that Work: A New Guide for Directors published by McGraw Hill.)

Corporate Governance

ISSN: 1472-0701

Article publication date: 1 March 2004

3316

Abstract

To date, corporate governance research agendas have tended to concentrate on one particular role that a board performs. For instance, agency theory concentrates on the monitoring role, resource dependence theory concentrates on the board providing access to resources and stewardship theory concentrates on the board’s advice‐giving or strategic role. While these approaches provide practitioners with useful guidelines regarding issues such as board independence, we contend that practitioners need to take care not to act on the recommendations from a single theory in isolation from the others. To address this concern, we provide a model of board effectiveness that uses the construct of board intellectual capital to integrate the predominant theories of corporate governance and illustrate how the board can drive corporate performance. We further contend that boards that wish to improve their performance need to review their intellectual capital. We conclude by linking the model to a practitioner‐focused framework that identifies four key areas on which a board must concentrate to develop its intellectual capital.

Keywords

Citation

Nicholson, G.J. and Kiel, G.C. (2004), "Breakthrough board performance: how to harness your board’s intellectual capital[1]", Corporate Governance, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700410521925

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2004, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles