To read this content please select one of the options below:

A framework of intangible valuation areas and antecedents

Andreas N. Andreou (Institute for Knowledge and Innovation, School of Engineering and Applied Science, Department of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA)
Annie Green (Institute for Knowledge and Innovation, School of Engineering and Applied Science, Department of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA)
Michael Stankosky (Institute for Knowledge and Innovation, School of Engineering and Applied Science, Department of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA)

Journal of Intellectual Capital

ISSN: 1469-1930

Article publication date: 23 January 2007

3253

Abstract

Purpose

The paper seeks to develop a list of operational knowledge assets as antecedents to a validated common taxonomy of intangible strategic value drivers.

Design/methodology/approach

Qualitative data from focus groups was collected to validate a theory‐based list. The list contains the value generation activities (i.e. performance focus areas) and their respective critical success factors emerging from the interaction of eight validated intangible value drivers. Two primary questions were addressed at the focus groups: What performance focus areas does the organization need to focus on?; and What knowledge do employees need to leverage within each focus area? Data were analyzed using template analysis. Structural equation modeling using PLS was performed to develop a theory about the impact of the list of operational knowledge assets on intellectual capital and business performance measures.

Findings

A validated list of knowledge assets called the list of operational knowledge assets (LOKA) was developed comprising 31 categories (i.e. critical success factors) grouped into seven value generating activities (i.e. performance focus areas). The thematic dimensions of each category surface internal views of a business that define the strategic and operational value drivers that are aligned with organizational performance.

Research limitations/implications

The list is not an exhaustive one but rather a template that can be adapted based on the industry investigated. The scope of the study was focused on the high‐tech federal contractors in the USA. Therefore the results and related models of this study are generic in nature. Future research could focus applying the study on different environments (i.e. organizational, cultural, type of knowledge workers) and compare results.

Practical implications

The paper could improve managers' understanding of the human capital drivers on performance and thus facilitate better resource allocation on human capital management practices, technology investments, process improvements and business intelligence functions.

Originality/value

The list of operational knowledge assets presents a first attempt in addressing the lack of understanding of the knowledge assets that managers need to leverage at the lowest level of operational granularity.

Keywords

Citation

Andreou, A.N., Green, A. and Stankosky, M. (2007), "A framework of intangible valuation areas and antecedents", Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 52-75. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930710715060

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2007, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles