Assessment in North American research libraries: a preliminary report card

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to report on the first phase of a two‐year project sponsored by the Association of Research Libraries, “Making Library Assessment Work: Practical Approaches for Developing and Sustaining Effective Assessment”.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper reports on the project, which is intended to provide libraries with the knowledge and understanding necessary to select and apply appropriate measurement techniques, and to use assessment data in decision making. The focus of this effort is on practical and sustainable approaches to effective assessment. The paper is particularly interested in the successful application of assessment within different organizational cultures and moving library assessment from a project‐based approach to a more programmatic, integrated, and sustainable operation within libraries.

Findings

The findings of the study indicate that all the ARL libraries in Phase I are developing a stronger understanding of the value of assessment and library leadership supports this movement. It finds that there are staff in each library who have good research methodology skills, although they may not be involved in assessment efforts. It reveals that areas that did not receive a passing grade in most libraries included resource allocation, sustainability, prioritizing needs, choosing the appropriate assessment method, using data for improvement, and communicating assessment results.

Originality/value

The paper provides useful information on a project intended to help librarians in decision making.

Citation

Hiller, S., Kyrillidou, M. and Self, J. (2006), "Assessment in North American research libraries: a preliminary report card", Performance Measurement and Metrics, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 100-106. https://doi.org/10.1108/14678040610679489