Shifting students’ to experts’ complex systems knowledge: Effects of bootstrapping, group discussion, and case study participation

Abstract

This paper includes three analyses concerning: expert support in the selection of impact variables for scientific models relevant to environmental planning, the quality of students’ individual estimates of corresponding impacts before and after a group discussion, and the accuracy of artificially‐aggregated judgments of independent groups. Participants were students of environmental sciences at ETH Zurich. The first analysis revealed that during participation in an environmental case study, students’ individual estimates of impacts of variables which have been suggested by experts increased, as compared to the estimates of impacts of additional variables, which have been selected by the students. The remaining analyses consider group discussions on the strength of particular environmental impacts. The quality of the estimates was analyzed referring to expert estimates of the impacts.

Citation

Hansmann, R., Mieg, H.A., Crott, H.W. and Scholz, R.W. (2003), "Shifting students’ to experts’ complex systems knowledge: Effects of bootstrapping, group discussion, and case study participation", International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 151-168. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370310467168