To read this content please select one of the options below:

Decision and debate: addressing the implications of the POVA banning list

Jill Manthorpe (Research Fellow Social Care Workforce Research Unit, King's College London)
Martin Stevens (Research Fellow Social Care Workforce Research Unit, King's College London)

The Journal of Adult Protection

ISSN: 1466-8203

Article publication date: 1 August 2006

113

Abstract

The Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Bill introduces a central vetting process for staff and volunteers working with vulnerable adults and children in England and Wales. This new scheme will bring together the current Protection of Vulnerable Adults banning scheme (POVA), List 99 (banning teachers) and the Protection of Children Act list (applicable to those working in childcare). This article draws on research analysing the first 100 referrals to the POVA list and identifies a series of prototypical cases and common themes. The discussion reveals the complexity of decision‐making in this type of regulation and its enforcement.

Keywords

Citation

Manthorpe, J. and Stevens, M. (2006), "Decision and debate: addressing the implications of the POVA banning list", The Journal of Adult Protection, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1108/14668203200600009

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2006, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles