To read this content please select one of the options below:

The processes and costs of local guideline development: experiences from the Path.Finder NHS consortium

Amanda Bowens (Amanda Bowens is a Research Assistant In Public Health Medicine, at the Nuffield Institute for Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.)
Mike Robinson (Mike Robinson is Senior Lecturer In Public Health Medicine, at the Nuffield Institute for Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.)
Ruth McDonald (Ruth McDonald is Health Economist at the University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK)
Phil Ayres (Phil Ayres is Associate Medical Director at the Leeds Teaching Hospitals, NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.)

British Journal of Clinical Governance

ISSN: 1466-4100

Article publication date: 1 September 2001

285

Abstract

The Path.Finder NHS consortium consists of ten acute hospitals sharing a common approach to the production and dissemination of local information for primary care, including clinical practice guidelines. Ten local guidelines were studied across four clinical areas: dyspepsia, lipids, eczema, and menorrhagia. Local guideline developers largely appear to be unconvinced that investment of time and resources in “proper” guideline development is cost‐effective. At the same time, primary care professionals’ views about future NICE guidelines may have been coloured by their current much more variable experience. Successful implementation of local guidelines is unlikely to be straightforward.

Keywords

Citation

Bowens, A., Robinson, M., McDonald, R. and Ayres, P. (2001), "The processes and costs of local guideline development: experiences from the Path.Finder NHS consortium", British Journal of Clinical Governance, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 159-165. https://doi.org/10.1108/14664100110400688

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 2001, MCB UP Limited

Related articles