To read this content please select one of the options below:

Restraint versus Restraints: defining the concepts for review and measurement

Helen Macilwaine (The State Hospital, Carstairs, Lanarkshire)
Carole Watson (The State Hospital, Carstairs, Lanarkshire)
Ian McKenzie (The State Hospital, Carstairs, Lanarkshire)

The British Journal of Forensic Practice

ISSN: 1463-6646

Article publication date: 1 September 1999

77

Abstract

There are considerable differences between the USA and the UK in terms of the practice of in‐patient care, particularly in the use of restraint. The American legal system defines restraint in terms of physical, mechanical, and chemical restraints, of which only physical and chemical restraints are routinely used in the UK. There is a need to agree a standard definition of restraint as it is used in the UK, which may be valuable as one proxy for quality. Such information would enable nurses to make appropriate use of the published literature, make valid comparisons within and between institutions, and provide evidence about the kind of nursing education and nursing practice development needed to produce quality patient care.

Citation

Macilwaine, H., Watson, C. and McKenzie, I. (1999), "Restraint versus Restraints: defining the concepts for review and measurement", The British Journal of Forensic Practice, Vol. 1 No. 3, pp. 27-33. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636646199900023

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1999, MCB UP Limited

Related articles