Implications of the self‐regulation model for treatment with sexual offenders with intellectual disabilities

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to explore treatment implications of the self‐regulation model (SRM) for sexual offenders with an intellectual disability in an effort to provide practical applications that could be employed in treatment.

Design/methodology/approach

The SRM of sexual offending proposes that difficulties in self‐regulation may lead to an increased risk of sexual offending; describing four potential pathways to sexual offending that are based on self‐regulation style and offence‐related goals. Research has focussed on the application and implications of this theoretical model for mainstream sexual offenders. However, more recently, there has been an increasing interest into the application and treatment implications for the SRM for sexual offenders with an intellectual disability. This paper reviews literature on both the SRM and related work on offenders with intellectual disability.

Findings

The evidence reviewed supports the notion that the SRM is a valid theoretical model on which to base treatment programmes for people with intellectual disabilities and specific recommendations are made for the design of treatment programmes with this client group.

Originality/value

It is suggested that this model should be used when devising intervention programmes for people with intellectual disabilities in the future.

Citation

Keeling, J.A. and Rose, J.L. (2012), "Implications of the self‐regulation model for treatment with sexual offenders with intellectual disabilities", The British Journal of Forensic Practice, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 29-39. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636641211204441