To read this content please select one of the options below:

Transferring subsidiary knowledge in the global learning context

Yuzhe Miao (PhD Candidate at the Graduate School of Business, Seoul National University, South Korea)
Soonkyoo Choe (Associate Professor of Strategy and International Business at the Graduate School of Business, Yonsei University, South Korea)
Jaeyong Song (Professor of Strategy and International Management at the Graduate School of Business, Seoul National University, South Korea)

Journal of Knowledge Management

ISSN: 1367-3270

Article publication date: 31 May 2011

2513

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to explore organizational factors that affect the transfer of subsidiary knowledge to both parent companies and peer subsidiaries.

Design/methodology/approach

The hypotheses are tested using multivariate regression, based on a survey of 81 foreign subsidiaries in South Korea.

Findings

The findings show that organizational factors that affect the transfer of subsidiary knowledge differ according to whether the recipient is the parent or the peer subsidiary. Subsidiary‐to‐parent knowledge flow is facilitated by establishing efficient formal mechanisms such as an expatriation policy, a subsidiary performance evaluation system, etc., whereas knowledge transfer to peer subsidiaries is enhanced by the length of a subsidiary's operation period and the frequency of its managers' communications with other managers in peer subsidiaries.

Practical implications

This analysis suggests that managers of multinational companies should apply different approaches in managing these two distinct knowledge flow patterns in the MNC network.

Originality/value

This study offers new insights into the challenges of global learning by highlighting the difficulty of transferring subsidiary knowledge to peer subsidiaries through formal organizational apparatuses.

Keywords

Citation

Miao, Y., Choe, S. and Song, J. (2011), "Transferring subsidiary knowledge in the global learning context", Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 478-496. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271111137448

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2011, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles