To read this content please select one of the options below:

Knowledge workers: exploring the link among performance rating, pay and motivational aspects

Alan D. Smith (Alan D. Smith is Professor of Operations Management, Robert Morris University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA (smitha@rmu.edu).)
William T. Rupp (William T. Rupp is Associate Professor of Management and Associate Dean, Robert Morris University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA (rupp@rmu.edu).)

Journal of Knowledge Management

ISSN: 1367-3270

Article publication date: 1 March 2003

12572

Abstract

Historically, performance appraisals were intended to focus on three areas: development, motivation, and recognition of achievement. One major purpose of performance appraisals is to determine individual merit, especially where pay for performance systems are employed. Based upon expectancy theory, high performance ratings should entail high merit increases while low performance ratings result in low merit increases. However, it appears that decoupling performance ratings and merit increases is common practice. This paper explores the effects of receiving a low performance rating and high merit increase or a high performance rating and a low merit increase and empirically investigate its impact on knowledge workers’ motivational and general morale.

Keywords

Citation

Smith, A.D. and Rupp, W.T. (2003), "Knowledge workers: exploring the link among performance rating, pay and motivational aspects", Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 107-124. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270310463662

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 2003, MCB UP Limited

Related articles