To read this content please select one of the options below:

Work‐family and interpersonal conflict as levers in the resource/demand‐outcome relationship

Jack K. Ito (Faculty of Business Administration, University of Regina, Regina, Canada)
Céleste M. Brotheridge (ESG‐UQAM, Montréal, Canada)

Career Development International

ISSN: 1362-0436

Article publication date: 14 September 2012

1947

Abstract

Purpose

This article seeks to apply the challenge–hindrance conceptualization of demands to a model that relates stressors to emotional exhaustion and job satisfaction. Supervisory support, a resource, is posited as a precursor to demands, and work–family conflict (WFC) and interpersonal conflict (IPC) at work are expected to mediate the demand–strain and job satisfaction relationships.

Design/methodology/approach

This cross‐sectional self‐report survey included a sample of 600 government employees in Canada.

Findings

In addition to directly influencing job satisfaction, supervisory support reduces strain and increases motivation by decreasing hindrances and interpersonal conflict. Also, although, challenge and hindrance demands are both positively associated with strain, task complexity is positively associated with job satisfaction, whereas role ambiguity and interpersonal conflict are negatively associated with job satisfaction. Furthermore, work–family conflict and interpersonal conflict fully mediate the effects of supervisory support, role conflict, and task complexity on strain, and they reduce the effects of ambiguity on strain. Thus, these factors have limited effects on strain by themselves; rather, they act on strain through emotional demands.

Research limitations/implications

Some challenges have a strong connection with resources, yet also induce strain. Future models should incorporate the challenge‐hindrance approach to classifying demands and should examine challenge demands that motivate people to engage in stressful activities. Also, although work‐family conflict and interpersonal conflict at work concern different spheres, future research should incorporate both spheres and employ emotional demands as mediating variables.

Practical implications

Given that some challenges can be motivating yet stressful, the consequences of interventions can be difficult to forecast. Results point to the importance of carefully designing interventions and the role of WFC and IPC as potential levers in managing strain arising from complex jobs and other types of challenges.

Originality/value

This paper considers a unique model of demands, resources, and outcome variables that contributes to the knowledge about how to address stress.

Keywords

Citation

Ito, J.K. and Brotheridge, C.M. (2012), "Work‐family and interpersonal conflict as levers in the resource/demand‐outcome relationship", Career Development International, Vol. 17 No. 5, pp. 392-413. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620431211269676

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2012, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles