How standards compete: comparative impact of coffee certification schemes in Northern Nicaragua

Ruerd Ruben (Centre for International Development Issues (CIDIN), Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands)
Guillermo Zuniga (Centro Internacional de Política Económica para el Desarrollo Sostenible (CINPE), Universidad Nacional, San Jose, Costa Rica)

Supply Chain Management

ISSN: 1359-8546

Publication date: 15 March 2011

Abstract

Purpose

Smallholder farmers are increasingly subject to different types of standards that offer specific conditions for their market incorporation. The proliferation of private and voluntary (civic) standards raises questions regarding their impact on farmers' welfare and their role in the upgrading of value chains. This paper aims to address this issue.

Design/methodology/approach

Based on extensive fieldwork and careful matching of 315 farmers in Northern Nicaragua who produce coffee under Fair Trade, Rainforest Alliance and Café Practices labels or deliver to independent traders, the effects on income, production and investments are compared. Moreover, the implications of different contract conditions for risk behaviour, organizational force, loyalty and gender attitudes are assessed.

Findings

The paper finds that Fair Trade provides better prices compared with independent producers, but private labels out‐compete Fair Trade in terms of yield and quality performance. While Fair Trade can be helpful to support initial market incorporation, private labels offer more suitable incentives for quality upgrading.

Research limitations/implications

Civic standards exhibit major effects on local institutions' and farmers' behaviour, while B2B standards are more effective for improving production and management practices. Dynamic improvement standards may bridge the gap between both.

Practical implications

Fair Trade standards are useful to provide initial market access to small‐holders, but private standards offer better prospects for subsequent quality upgrading.

Originality/value

This is the first large‐scale comparative impact assessment of coffee standards that delivers unbiased empirical results.

Keywords

Citation

Ruerd Ruben and Guillermo Zuniga (2011) "How standards compete: comparative impact of coffee certification schemes in Northern Nicaragua", Supply Chain Management, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 98-109

Download as .RIS

DOI

: https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541111115356

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2011, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Please note you might not have access to this content

You may be able to access this content by login via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
If you would like to contact us about accessing this content, click the button and fill out the form.
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.