Effective interpersonal communication in Japanese companies under performance‐ based personnel practices

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to explore the relationships among information‐seeking behavior, interpersonal communication, perceived procedural justice, and the reduction of job‐related uncertainty.

Design/methodology/approach

The sample consisted of 323 Japanese white‐collar workers who completed the questionnaires, with a usable sample of 295.

Findings

The results of covariance structure analysis (SEM) revealed that: there were not any direct relationships between information‐seeking behavior and the reduction of work‐related uncertainty; information‐seeking behavior induced a change of voice, explanation, and rational interpersonal communication from decision makers; the provision of voice, explanation, and social sensitivity from decision makers caused outcome recipients’ perception of procedural justice; and their perception of procedural justice caused the reduction of job‐related uncertainty.

Research limitations/implications

There are some limitations of the present study that can be addressed in future research. First, the concept of uncertainty might have been used too broadly to have been applied to the concept of job‐related uncertainty. Second, the respondents in the present research were highly educated white‐collar workers and were selected to attend business school by their companies.

Practical implications

The results of the present study have some practical implications. Under a newly introduced managerial system of performance‐based personnel practices, Japanese companies need to establish a system by which workers can form judgements of fairness.

Originality/value

The paper suggests that one must exercise caution when generalizing the findings of the present study without taking into account the characteristics of the respondents.

Citation

Yamaguchi, I. (2005), "Effective interpersonal communication in Japanese companies under performance‐ based personnel practices", Corporate Communications: An International Journal, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 139-155. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280510596952