To read this content please select one of the options below:

Self‐assembly in additive manufacturing: opportunities and obstacles

N.B. Crane (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA)
J. Tuckerman (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA)
G.N. Nielson (Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA)

Rapid Prototyping Journal

ISSN: 1355-2546

Article publication date: 26 April 2011

1665

Abstract

Purpose

Additive manufacturing (AM) offers substantial flexibility in shape, but much less flexibility in materials and functionality – particularly at small size scales. A system for automatically incorporating microscale components would enable the fabrication of objects with more functionality. The purpose of this paper is to consider the potential of self‐assembly to serve as an automated programmable integration method. In particular, it addresses the ability of random self‐assembly processes to successfully assemble objects with high performance despite the possibility of assembly errors.

Design/methodology/approach

A self‐assembled thermoelectric system is taken as a sample system. The performance expectations for these systems are then predicted using modified one‐dimensional models that incorporate the effects of random errors. Monte‐Carlo simulation is used to predict the likely performance of self‐assembled thermoelectric systems and evaluate the impact of key process and system design parameters.

Findings

While assembly yield can drop quickly with increasing numbers of assembled parts, large functional assemblies can be constructed by arranging components in parallel to provide redundancy. In some cases, the performance losses are minimal. Alternatively, sensing can be incorporated to identify perfect assemblies. For small assemblies, the probability of perfection may be high enough to achieve an acceptable assembly rate. Small assemblies could then be combined into larger functional systems.

Originality/value

The paper identifies two strategies that can guide the development of AM processes that incorporate miniature components to increase the system functionality. The analysis shows that this may be possible despite significant errors in the self‐assembly process because systems may be tolerant of significant assembly errors.

Keywords

Citation

Crane, N.B., Tuckerman, J. and Nielson, G.N. (2011), "Self‐assembly in additive manufacturing: opportunities and obstacles", Rapid Prototyping Journal, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 211-217. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552541111124798

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2011, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles