To read this content please select one of the options below:

Do feminine cultures really behave more feminine than masculine cultures? A comparison of 48 countries femininity‐masculinity ranking to their UN human development rankings

Carl A. Rodrigues (Professor of International Management, Department of Management School of Business, Montclair State University, Upper Montclair, NJ)
Harvey Blumberg (Professor of Quantitative Methods, Department of Decision Sciences, School of Business, Montclair State University)

Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal

ISSN: 1352-7606

Article publication date: 1 September 2000

2450

Abstract

Do feminine cultures really behave more feminine than masculine cultures?. A comparison of 48 countries femininity‐masculineity ranking to their UN human development rankings. Reveals that feminine cultures do apply greater intensity in investing in human development programmes, including care for the weak and gender equity development than masculine cultures. States that both score low on empowerment of females, suggesting that a countrys power distance measurement affects this. Implies that managers of international firms will find greater demand for improved quality of work and female empowerment programmes in feminine/small power distance countries than feminine high power distance countries and masculine countries. Qualifies comparisons by outlining problems within the UN statistical data.

Keywords

Citation

Rodrigues, C.A. and Blumberg, H. (2000), "Do feminine cultures really behave more feminine than masculine cultures? A comparison of 48 countries femininity‐masculinity ranking to their UN human development rankings", Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 25-34. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527600010797110

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 2000, MCB UP Limited

Related articles