To read this content please select one of the options below:

Characteristics of routine, development and idea networks in teams

Anssi Smedlund (Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland)

Team Performance Management

ISSN: 1352-7592

Article publication date: 9 March 2010

1245

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to propose that there is not one ideal network structure of knowledge flow, but many, and that the network structures of knowledge flows between employees in teams are task‐related.

Design/methodology/approach

Ideal knowledge network structures in teams are examined on the basis of the literature. A case study of a well‐established team, presented with social network analysis methods, reveals the different structures of knowledge flow.

Findings

According to the case study, it is shown that the network structures of knowledge flow are different in different tasks. It is suggested on the basis of theory that the ideal knowledge network structures are hierarchical for routine tasks, core‐peripheral for development tasks and ego‐centric for idea generation tasks.

Research limitations/implications

The research design presented in this paper should be applied to more cases to ascertain its validity.

Practical implications

This paper provides means for understanding, assessing and managing knowledge networks in teams.

Originality/value

Flows of knowledge have been found to be an important area in network research. This paper shows how they are structured according to the nature of the tasks.

Keywords

Citation

Smedlund, A. (2010), "Characteristics of routine, development and idea networks in teams", Team Performance Management, Vol. 16 No. 1/2, pp. 95-117. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527591011028942

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2010, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles