Emerald logo
Advanced search

Using a multi‐method qualitative approach to examine collaborative relationships

Nitha Palakshappa (Department of Commerce, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand)
Mary Ellen Gordon (Market Truths Ltd, Omarama, New Zealand)

Qualitative Market Research

ISSN: 1352-2752

Publication date: 1 October 2006

Abstract

Purpose

–

The purpose of this paper is to describe a multi‐method approach for examining collaborative relationships.

Design/methodology/approach

–

Collaborative relationship performance is examined by combining narratives, structured questionnaires, and perceptual mapping within a case‐based approach.

Findings

–

Details associated with case selection and subsequent analysis are discussed. Themes emerging from the study are used to illustrate the depth of insights that were gained.

Research implications/limitations

–

The findings demonstrate the value of the approach in discovering insights that would not have emerged from more commonly utilised methodologies.

Practical implications

–

The methodology described in this paper captures the detailed dynamics of collaborative business relationships. As such, it allowed us to identify specific steps that managers can take to improve the performance of their collaborative relationships: in particular by ensuring that everyone involved in the relationship shares an understanding of the purpose of the relationship, and the roles of the participating individuals and organisations.

Originality/value

–

The paper describes a new approach to studying collaborative business relationships, which is needed since the overall performance of collaborative business relationships is not improving in spite of extensive previous research trying to uncover the factors that influence performance.

Keywords

  • Qualitative research
  • Research methods
  • Joint ventures
  • Partnership
  • Strategic alliances

Citation

Palakshappa, N. and Ellen Gordon, M. (2006), "Using a multi‐method qualitative approach to examine collaborative relationships", Qualitative Market Research, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 389-403. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750610689104

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2006, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Please note you might not have access to this content

You may be able to access this content by login via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
Login
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.
Rent from Deepdyve
If you would like to contact us about accessing this content, click the button and fill out the form.
Contact us
Emerald Publishing
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
© 2019 Emerald Publishing Limited

Services

  • Authors Opens in new window
  • Editors Opens in new window
  • Librarians Opens in new window
  • Researchers Opens in new window
  • Reviewers Opens in new window

About

  • About Emerald Opens in new window
  • Working for Emerald Opens in new window
  • Contact us Opens in new window
  • Publication Sitemap

Policies and information

  • Legal Opens in new window
  • Editorial policy Opens in new window & originality guidelines Opens in new window
  • Site policies
  • Modern Slavery Act Opens in new window

We’re listening — tell us what you think

  • Something didn’t work…

    Report bugs here

  • All feedback is valuable

    Please share your general feedback

  • Member of Emerald’s Library Advisory Network?

    You can start or join in a discussion here.
    If you’d like to know more about The Network, please email us

Join us on our journey

  • Platform update page

    Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

  • Frequently Asked Questions

    Your questions answered here