The purpose of this paper is to develop a model to explain frontline employee absence as a form of concerted resistance in a public service welfare environment.
Conflicts over absenteeism can be interpreted as a mix of formal and informal struggles over the effort bargain. Centrelink workers' use of “unplanned leave” between 2005 and 2007 involved the quasi‐collective use of a formal entitlement in a form of misbehaviour that defied management control.
Whereas absenteeism is normally assumed to be a form of unorganised individual time‐theft, in this study it became a tacitly‐agreed form of collective resistance and a way of affirming collectively negotiated rights.
This paper explores how the toll of cost cutting and implementation of tighter welfare eligibility rules elicited collective resistance through leave taking and highlights how absenteeism can be more than an individual response of passive disengagement.
Using theories of resistance, the authors highlight how the case study both conforms to and departs from the received wisdom about absenteeism as an individual oppositional strategy.
Junor, A., O'Brien, J. and O'Donnell, M. (2009), "Welfare wars: public service frontline absenteeism as collective resistance", Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Vol. 6 No. 1/2, pp. 26-40. https://doi.org/10.1108/11766090910940647Download as .RIS
Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2009, Emerald Group Publishing Limited