Welfare wars: public service frontline absenteeism as collective resistance

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to develop a model to explain frontline employee absence as a form of concerted resistance in a public service welfare environment.

Design/methodology/approach

Conflicts over absenteeism can be interpreted as a mix of formal and informal struggles over the effort bargain. Centrelink workers' use of “unplanned leave” between 2005 and 2007 involved the quasi‐collective use of a formal entitlement in a form of misbehaviour that defied management control.

Findings

Whereas absenteeism is normally assumed to be a form of unorganised individual time‐theft, in this study it became a tacitly‐agreed form of collective resistance and a way of affirming collectively negotiated rights.

Research limitations/implications

This paper explores how the toll of cost cutting and implementation of tighter welfare eligibility rules elicited collective resistance through leave taking and highlights how absenteeism can be more than an individual response of passive disengagement.

Originality/value

Using theories of resistance, the authors highlight how the case study both conforms to and departs from the received wisdom about absenteeism as an individual oppositional strategy.

Citation

Junor, A., O'Brien, J. and O'Donnell, M. (2009), "Welfare wars: public service frontline absenteeism as collective resistance", Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Vol. 6 No. 1/2, pp. 26-40. https://doi.org/10.1108/11766090910940647