Does a brand have to be consistent?

Abstract

Purpose

This conceptual paper seeks to examine the issue of whether or not a brand needs to be consistent. Whilst this assumption often seems to be made within the marketing literature, it has not previously been examined.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper uses the example of wine to explore the consumer's desire for consistency. The paper is not based on a specific research project, but rather reflects the findings of a number of projects, and of an engagement with commentators on wine over a number of years.

Findings

The paper suggests that rather than wine invariably being the same it is necessary for it to offer a regular standard of quality within varying external constraints, and that consumers may actually search out such inconsistency. By extension, it is argued that this is relevant for other goods, such as a foods and fashions, and aesthetic and ludic products.

Practical implications

It may be relevant for managers to build inconsistency into product design in some cases to give consumers the chance of involvement in brand co‐creation.

Originality/value

The paper examines an aspect of brands (consistency) not previously considered, and moves on the current debate about consumer participation in the development of brand meaning.

Citation

Charters, S. (2009), "Does a brand have to be consistent?", Journal of Product & Brand Management, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 284-291. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420910972800