To read this content please select one of the options below:

High‐low pricing: audit evidence and consumer preferences

Peter J. McGoldrick (Professor of Retailing, Manchester School of Management, UMIST, Manchester, UK)
Erica J. Betts (Visiting Lecturer, Manchester School of Management, UMIST, Manchester, UK)
Kathy A. Keeling (Research Fellow, Manchester School of Management, UMIST, Manchester, UK)

Journal of Product & Brand Management

ISSN: 1061-0421

Article publication date: 1 September 2000

5412

Abstract

In spite of their importance within pricing strategies, “seasonal sales” have received little attention within the literature. The recent interest in “high‐low” pricing has, however, increased the attention given to temporal shifts in store‐wide, rather than item level, prices. Following a brief review, this paper draws upon two case studies of leading retailers of apparel in the UK. Evidence is also presented from audits of pricing and markdown activities over a three‐year period, illustrating some contrasts between stated strategies and actual pricing activities. A cost‐benefit analysis of high‐low pricing requires knowledge of consumer preferences and attitudes. Results are drawn from a study of over 2,600 “sale” shoppers, indicating stated preferences for markdown frequency, depth and coverage. In general “sale” shoppers appear to prefer a variety of markdown levels, increasing their scope to succeed as bargain hunters.

Keywords

Citation

McGoldrick, P.J., Betts, E.J. and Keeling, K.A. (2000), "High‐low pricing: audit evidence and consumer preferences", Journal of Product & Brand Management, Vol. 9 No. 5, pp. 316-331. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420010347119

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 2000, MCB UP Limited

Related articles