TY  - JOUR
AB  - This paper is a continuation of the antagonistic dialogue about the differences of chaordic systems thinking (CST) and socio‐technical systems design (STS). In this second part of the conversation a concrete example is used to illustrate the added value provided by CST. Whereas STS focuses on an organization's surface by designing processes and structures, CST aims at a developed mind and hence at the capability to reflect and understand. It is assumed that consciousness is the basis for the emergence of real organizational novelty, and thus, a prerequisite for viability.
VL  - 11
IS  - 6
SN  - 0969-6474
DO  - 10.1108/09696470410548818
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1108/09696470410548818
AU  - Wäfler Toni
PY  - 2004
Y1  - 2004/01/01
TI  - An antagonistic dialogue about chaordic systems thinking: part II
T2  - The Learning Organization
PB  - Emerald Group Publishing Limited
SP  - 458
EP  - 465
Y2  - 2024/04/26
ER  -