To read this content please select one of the options below:

From continuous improvement to organisational learning: developmental theory

Peter Murray (Peter Murray is Senior Lecturer in Human Resource Management, at Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia.)
Ross Chapman (Ross Chapman is Associate Professor, at the University of Western Sydney, Penrith Sth DC, New South Wales, Australia.)

The Learning Organization

ISSN: 0969-6474

Article publication date: 1 October 2003

6558

Abstract

As a learning theory, the continuous improvement (CI) discourse has benefited countless manufacturing enterprises to improve and adapt their methods of production. As one of the pillars of total quality management, it has generally included a range of dynamic concepts from high involvement teamwork and production enablers, to other social and technical capabilities such as innovation techniques. Such methodologies have been promoted in the literature as potential manifestos that can transform existing capabilities from simple representations of capability, to dynamically integrated ones (often labelled “full CI capacity”). The latter term in particular deserves more attention in the literature. Since CI techniques cannot be separated from organisational learning methodologies, it follows that CI methods should underpin holistic learning. This paper explores whether CI methodologies have advanced far enough to be considered as integrated and holistic in their own right. If not, it follows that new theories, challenges and discourses should be considered for exploration in the CI literature.

Keywords

Citation

Murray, P. and Chapman, R. (2003), "From continuous improvement to organisational learning: developmental theory", The Learning Organization, Vol. 10 No. 5, pp. 272-282. https://doi.org/10.1108/09696470310486629

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 2003, MCB UP Limited

Related articles