To read this content please select one of the options below:

Headquarters‐foreign subsidiary control relationships: three conceptual frameworks

Carl A. Rodrigues (Associate Professor of Management, Department of Management, School of Business Administration, Montclair State University, Upper Montclair, New Jersey, USA.)

Empowerment in Organizations

ISSN: 0968-4891

Article publication date: 1 September 1995

3223

Abstract

When a corporation establishes a subsidiary in a foreign country, its managers must decide how much control they need to maintain over the subsidiary′s managers. A headquarters‐foreign subsidiary control relationship (HSR) can be one of centralization or decentralization. The first framework proposes that national culture influences the HSR. The second framework posits that certain situational factors influence the HSR in all countries. The third framework puts forth the idea that either too much centralization or too much decentralization eventually leads to organizational ineffectiveness. Therefore, effective HSRs are those which are balanced. A balanced HSR is attained when headquarters (HQ) managers make decisions based on: an understanding of the cultural and other needs of foreign subsidiary managers; an understanding of the needs of specific organizational situations; and an organizational global vision, core values, and cultural principles which are shared by all subsidiary managers.

Keywords

Citation

Rodrigues, C.A. (1995), "Headquarters‐foreign subsidiary control relationships: three conceptual frameworks", Empowerment in Organizations, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 25-34. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684899510094954

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1995, MCB UP Limited

Related articles