To read this content please select one of the options below:

Benchmarking: an alternative to OFSTED – lessons for higher education

John Brennan (Senior Lecturer in Education at De Montfort University, Bedford. He has been Head of primary and secondary phase schools and part of Her Majesty′s Inspectorate.)

Quality Assurance in Education

ISSN: 0968-4883

Article publication date: 1 March 1995

632

Abstract

Schools and colleges have been placed firmly in the marketplace and are adopting appropriate strategies. Companies facing severe competition have learned to look at the quality, both of product and process, of their competitors, giving rise to the growing practice of benchmarking. Schools and colleges are currently being judged by a mechanistic, outcomes‐based inspection method which could provide the only benchmark for most teachers. Argues for collaborative benchmarking where schools and colleges examine in particular the quality of their processes in a search for how value is really added to the students′ experience. Emphasizes the need for an alternative perception of schools to that represented by OFSTED and suggests that benchmarking could be an important, and subversive, alternative.

Keywords

Citation

Brennan, J. (1995), "Benchmarking: an alternative to OFSTED – lessons for higher education", Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 36-38. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684889510082417

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1995, MCB UP Limited

Related articles