To read this content please select one of the options below:

Does internal quality management contribute to more control or to improvement of higher education? A survey on faculty's perceptions

Jan Kleijnen (Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, The Netherlands)
Diana Dolmans (Department of Educational Development and Research at the Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands)
Jos Willems (Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, The Netherlands)
Hans van Hout (Department of Educational Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Naarden, The Netherlands)

Quality Assurance in Education

ISSN: 0968-4883

Article publication date: 26 April 2011

2995

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to explore faculty's perceptions of quality management activities (QMA) within their departments, attention being paid to relevant quality aspects and whether quality management contributes to control or improvement of higher education. Furthermore, it examines differences between departments and relationships between the different variables.

Design/methodology/approach

A questionnaire containing items with Likert‐type answer scales was distributed to faculty (n=266) of 18 departments of universities of applied sciences in the Netherlands: 16 items dealt with QMA, 17 with attention paid to relevant quality aspects and ten with the perceived effects.

Findings

Faculty were neutral about the degree to which sufficient QMA were conducted within their departments. They were positive about the attention paid to relevant quality aspects. Furthermore, they were positive about the effects in terms of improvement and negative about the effects in terms of control. Significant differences were found between departments. Finally, positive correlations were found between management activities, attention being paid to quality aspects and the perceived effect in terms of improvement.

Research limitations/implications

The main limitation of this study is that only faculty's perceptions were measured, thus it is not clear whether these QMA really result in improvement in educational practice.

Practical implications

Departments paying little attention to quality aspects and with few QMA could really benefit from further increasing their quality management efforts.

Originality/value

Quality management is often seen as mainly contributing to control and managerialism. This study demonstrates that according to faculty, quality management is influencing improvement positively.

Keywords

Citation

Kleijnen, J., Dolmans, D., Willems, J. and van Hout, H. (2011), "Does internal quality management contribute to more control or to improvement of higher education? A survey on faculty's perceptions", Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 141-155. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684881111125041

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2011, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles