To read this content please select one of the options below:

Doctorates – converging or diverging patterns of provision

Stephen Hoddell (Dean of Computing, Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, at the University of the West of England, Bristol, UK)
Deborah Street (Senior Lecturer in Statistics and Awards Director for Mathematical Sciences at the University of the West of England, Bristol, UK)
Helena Wildblood (Specialist in Professional and Communication Skills, all at the University of the West of England, Bristol, UK)

Quality Assurance in Education

ISSN: 0968-4883

Article publication date: 1 June 2002

1048

Abstract

Since the 1980s, the traditional research‐based route to a PhD and the PhD by publication have been joined by practice‐based doctorates, professional doctorates and recently by the new route PhD. The National Qualifications Framework was intended to provide points of reference for the setting, assessment and maintenance of standards at all levels of qualification. Qualification descriptors are intended to articulate the achievements and wider abilities which candidates at any level should be able to demonstrate. Examines the implications of the NQF for doctorates, and reviews the extent to which the various doctoral routes meet its requirements. Regulations, award processes and submission requirements frequently offer inadequate opportunities for candidates to demonstrate the NQF descriptors, and there is considerable divergence in practice as well as in title. There is a need for consistency, which could be achieved with the convergence of doctoral routes towards the new route PhD and the professional doctorate.

Keywords

Citation

Hoddell, S., Street, D. and Wildblood, H. (2002), "Doctorates – converging or diverging patterns of provision", Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 61-70. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880210423546

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 2002, MCB UP Limited

Related articles