The techniques of risk analysis are insufficient in themselves

Steve Frosdick (Honorary Fellow, University of Bradford Management Centre and Director, IWI Associates Ltd, Hounslow, Middlesex, UK)

Disaster Prevention and Management

ISSN: 0965-3562

Publication date: 1 August 1997

Abstract

Explores the thesis that the techniques of risk analysis are necessary but in themselves insufficient components of the management of risk process. Begins by exploring the debate about risk. Proposes a definition of risk analysis, suggesting that the term refers to the sum of risk identification, estimation and evaluation. Takes the three component headings as the frameworks. Within each framework, gives an overview followed by an outline of the more common and important techniques. Discusses the issues of sufficiency and draws conclusions. Refers to the decision making techniques of risk management and sets out the overall conclusions substantiating the thesis.

Keywords

Citation

Frosdick, S. (1997), "The techniques of risk analysis are insufficient in themselves", Disaster Prevention and Management, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 165-177. https://doi.org/10.1108/09653569710172937

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1997, MCB UP Limited

Please note you might not have access to this content

You may be able to access this content by login via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
If you would like to contact us about accessing this content, click the button and fill out the form.
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.