TY  - JOUR
AB  - Examines the social environment experienced by UK food retailers regarding the marketing of genetically modified (GM) foodstuffs. Beck’s notion of risk society provides a critical foundation for analysing retail organisations’ decision making under conditions of “post‐Enlightenment contemporary irrationality”. He advocates “understanding and conceptualisation” of “… insecurities of the contemporary spirit …”, arguing of these that it is“… ideologically cynical to deny and dangerous to yield to uncritically”. The paper also draws upon Habermas, who describes three phenomena that sensitise “new social movements”; reactions to perceptions of “excessive complexity”; the apparent undermining of nature’s “organic foundations”; and a feeling of “overburdening or distortion” in “communicative infrastructures”. These dynamics should all inform any socially sensitive retailer response. The paper is not ethically prescriptive, but seeks to illustrate critically how conceptualisations of risk contribute to the social construction of ethical issues.
VL  - 28
IS  - 11
SN  - 0959-0552
DO  - 10.1108/09590550010356813
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1108/09590550010356813
AU  - Pearce Richard
AU  - Hansson Maria
PY  - 2000
Y1  - 2000/01/01
TI  - Retailing and risk society: genetically modified food
T2  - International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management
PB  - MCB UP Ltd
SP  - 450
EP  - 459
Y2  - 2024/04/25
ER  -