To read this content please select one of the options below:

School ethical climate and teachers' voluntary absence

Orly Shapira‐Lishchinsky (Department of Educational Administration, Leadership and Policy, School of Education, Bar‐Ilan University, Israel)
Zehava Rosenblatt (Faculty of Education, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel)

Journal of Educational Administration

ISSN: 0957-8234

Article publication date: 23 March 2010

2129

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to offer a theoretical framework for linking school ethical climate with teachers' voluntary absence. The paper attempts to explain this relationship using the concept of affective organizational commitment.

Design/methodology/approach

Participants were 1,016 school teachers from 35 high schools in Israel. Data were collected by self‐report questionnaires and tested against archival data. The GENMOD procedure of SAS was applied. This procedure enables regression models for variables which are not necessarily normally distributed – such as absence – to be fit and also to account for the intraclass‐correlations within schools. Absence was measured by frequency of absence events, and ethical climate was measured by two dimensions: caring and formal.

Findings

Results show that caring and formal ethical climates are both related to teacher absence. Affective commitment was found to mediate the relationship between formal ethical climate and absence frequency. This is not true for the ethical climate of caring.

Practical implications

School principals may reduce voluntary absence by creating an ethical climate focused on caring and clear and just rules and procedures.

Originality/value

Whereas past research on work absence focused primarily on personal antecedents, the present study addresses factors embedded in school ethics. The results contribute to knowledge of the influence of organizational context on absence behavior.

Keywords

Citation

Shapira‐Lishchinsky, O. and Rosenblatt, Z. (2010), "School ethical climate and teachers' voluntary absence", Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 48 No. 2, pp. 164-181. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231011027833

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2010, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles