To read this content please select one of the options below:

Principals' value‐informed decision making, intrapersonal moral discord, and pathways to resolution: The complexities of moral leadership praxis

William C. Frick (Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies, College of Education, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA)

Journal of Educational Administration

ISSN: 0957-8234

Article publication date: 30 January 2009

4377

Abstract

Purpose

This research seeks to explore the inevitable internal struggle experienced by school leaders when making ethically‐informed judgments. The study acquired principals' intimate reflections about professional decision making in response to personal versus organizational and/or professional value discrepancy as identified in the ethic of the profession and its model for promoting students' best interests.

Design/methodology/approach

A modified phenomenological research method, appropriate for an educational research context, was used to capture administrators' perspectives about moral practice and decision‐making experiences. The primary data collection strategy was participant interviews by means of purposeful sampling.

Findings

A clash between personal beliefs and values and organizational/professional expectations was very real for participants. The experience was generally frequent, but varied among principals. The struggle can be characterized as a phenomenon of intrapersonal moral discord experienced as part of the process of deciding ethically when faced with difficult moral choices.

Practical implications

The study contributes to the understanding of moral conflict in school leadership as an intrapersonal moral phenomenon, and how the conflict is resolved in practice, while providing insights into a more recently defined and theorized professional ethic for educational leadership. The study offers empirically derived knowledge for theory building and offers conceptual clarification of the moral leadership construct.

Originality/value

Moral judgment was complicated and contextually defined for participants. Administrators reported various ways of dealing with the nuances of personal and organizational value incongruity in order to engage in ethical decision making, including relying on, in some instances, a fundamental professional injunction.

Keywords

Citation

Frick, W.C. (2009), "Principals' value‐informed decision making, intrapersonal moral discord, and pathways to resolution: The complexities of moral leadership praxis", Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 47 No. 1, pp. 50-74. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230910928089

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2009, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles