To read this content please select one of the options below:

An Empirical Comparison of Anticipatory and Response‐Based Supply Chain Strategies

David J. Closs (Michigan State University)
Anthony S. Roath (Michigan State University)
Thomas J. Goldsby (Iowa State University)
James A. Eckert (Northeastern University)
Stephen M. Swartz (Air Force Institute of Technology)

The International Journal of Logistics Management

ISSN: 0957-4093

Article publication date: 1 July 1998

877

Abstract

This paper reports simulation research that empirically investigates and compares supply chain performance under varying conditions of information exchange and demand uncertainty. Specifically, the research objective is to quantitatively document the characteristics and performance impact of information exchange among supply chain entities. The findings suggest that the response‐based supply chain model consistently outperforms the anticipatory model in terms of customer service delivered under conditions of both low and high demand variation. Comparisons of inventory holdings across supply chain models demonstrate that the retailers' inventory burden is significantly lower in the response‐based scenario. The inventory savings enjoyed by retailers in the response‐based model are substantial enough to lower system‐wide inventories. In sum, the study supports the feasibility of achieving both improved service and lower inventories as a result of information sharing.

Keywords

Citation

Closs, D.J., Roath, A.S., Goldsby, T.J., Eckert, J.A. and Swartz, S.M. (1998), "An Empirical Comparison of Anticipatory and Response‐Based Supply Chain Strategies", The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 21-34. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574099810805816

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1998, MCB UP Limited

Related articles