Advanced search

A review of the transportation mode choice and carrier selection literature

Mary J. Meixell (Department of Management, Quinnipiac University, Hamden, Connecticut, USA)
Mario Norbis (Department of Management, Quinnipiac University, Hamden, Connecticut, USA)

International Journal of Logistics Management, The

ISSN: 0957-4093

Publication date: 15 August 2008

Abstract

Purpose

–

The purpose of this paper is to categorize transportation choice research (mode choice and carrier selection) leading to insight on themes in the literature and directions for future research

Design/methodology/approach

–

The proposed transportation choice research categorization framework is based on a comprehensive literature review of the peer‐reviewed journal papers published over the past 20 years, supplemented with a review of practitioner articles to identify current challenges in the logistics field. The academic papers are analyzed in terms of research purpose/question, methodology, findings, and challenges addressed.

Findings

–

The review reveals that several important themes are under‐represented in the transportation choice literature: environmental and energy use concerns; security in the supply chain; supply chain integration; international growth; and the role of the internet and emerging information technologies. This review also found that simulation, case study, and interview methodologies are under‐represented, and that normative modeling research is only lightly represented in this research.

Originality/value

–

The contributions of this research are three‐fold: the development of a classification scheme for transportation choice research, a structured review that provides a guide to earlier research on the subject of transportation choice, and the identification of research issues for future investigation.

Keywords

Citation

Meixell, M. and Norbis, M. (2008), "A review of the transportation mode choice and carrier selection literature", International Journal of Logistics Management, The, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 183-211. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090810895951

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2008, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Please note you might not have access to this content

You may be able to access this content by login via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.
Rent from Deepdyve
If you would like to contact us about accessing this content, click the button and fill out the form.
Contact us

We’re listening — tell us what you think

Join us on our journey