TY  - JOUR
AB  - The recent economic/environmental discourse on development issues has led to a new paradigm of development, called here the “eco‐economic development model”, but usually known as sustainable development (including both ecological and economic concerns), which has successfully substituted the traditional model of economic development in general acceptance. However, new models usually imply new rules and perhaps a new type of market, yet policy issues within the eco‐economic development paradigm are being addressed with theoretical constructs and a state of mind as if we were still in the old paradigm – perhaps because the nature and the internal structure of the new paradigm are not yet well known and understood, as nobody has apparently looked into this. It should be expected that the two paradigms are not equivalent to each other, and therefore, they should be addressed differently. This paper presents a qualitative approach, from a systematic point of view, which can be used to highlight how different the two paradigms are in terms of structure and policy implications. Then, this information is used to provide an answer to three questions: is the economic development market the same as the eco‐economic development market; if not, how many invisible hands are there in the eco‐economic development market; and what are the environmental, social, and economic policy implications of this situation?. Shows that new paradigms require a new line of thinking to market policy and planning.
VL  - 11
IS  - 2
SN  - 0956-6163
DO  - 10.1108/09566160010321578
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1108/09566160010321578
AU  - Munoz Lucio
PY  - 2000
Y1  - 2000/01/01
TI  - An overview of some of the policy implications of the eco‐economic development market
T2  - Environmental Management and Health
PB  - MCB UP Ltd
SP  - 157
EP  - 174
Y2  - 2024/05/07
ER  -