Perceived justice and consumption experience evaluations: A qualitative and experimental investigation

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to investigate the role of perceived justice in service consumption/purchase experiences.

Design/methodology/approach

In an initial study, using the critical incident method, the authors show that customers are strongly concerned by perceived injustice. Their judgments involve the three components of justice described in organizational and service marketing literature: distributive, procedural and interactional justice. They also identify a macro‐level justice factor which characterizes the perception of collective practices at the industry level. In an experiment applied to the dining experience, the authors manipulate distributive, procedural and interactional justice perception to study their impact on service evaluation (quality, value), satisfaction and relationship quality (trust, commitment).

Findings

Contrary to the satisfaction literature, the authors observe a slight direct effect of justice on satisfaction, but rather indirect impacts through perceived quality (outcome and interaction) and value. Moreover, perception of justice has substantial effects on trust (credibility and benevolence) but not on commitment.

Originality/value

The paper studies the impact of justice in the context of a customer experience evaluation (service delivery) which is not limited to service recovery. It examines the entire evaluation process, including service evaluation (quality, value), satisfaction and relationship quality (trust, commitment).

Citation

Aurier, P. and Siadou‐Martin, B. (2007), "Perceived justice and consumption experience evaluations: A qualitative and experimental investigation", International Journal of Service Industry Management, Vol. 18 No. 5, pp. 450-471. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564230710826241