To read this content please select one of the options below:

Deinternationalisation: towards a coevolutionary framework

Colin Turner (Department of Business Management, School of Management and Languages, Heriot Watt University, Edinburgh, UK)

European Business Review

ISSN: 0955-534X

Article publication date: 2 March 2012

1111

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to examine deinternationalisation through the lens of coevolutionary theory. The intention is to offer a fuller understanding of the processes and strategic challenges involved in this process and establish a path for future research in this area of internationalisation theory.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper draws links between emerging themes in organizational theory and internationalisation to aid the conceptual development and understanding of the process of deinternationalisation.

Findings

The exploration of links between organizational theory and internationalisation allows for the process of deinternationalisation to be more fully distinguished. The paper identifies processes of managed selection and retardation that will inform this process of organizational change.

Research limitations/implications

Whilst there are concerns over the applicability of concepts from natural sciences within the social sciences, the paper does offer a number of research propositions to guide future academic investigation within the field of deinternationalisation.

Originality/value

By linking research on coevolution to the study of internationalisation, the paper contributes to the understanding of the emergence of differing paths and trajectories involved in the process of international contraction and expansion. Furthermore, coevolutionary theory allows the process of deinternationalisation to be conceptualized as a means of generating and guiding future study on this under‐explored area of internationalization research.

Keywords

Citation

Turner, C. (2012), "Deinternationalisation: towards a coevolutionary framework", European Business Review, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 92-105. https://doi.org/10.1108/09555341211203973

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2012, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles