To read this content please select one of the options below:

Fixing the language of change? A response

David Collins (Department of Accounting, Finance and Management, Essex Management Centre, University of Essex, Colchester, UK)

Journal of Organizational Change Management

ISSN: 0953-4814

Article publication date: 1 October 2003

2133

Abstract

Offers a response to a discussion of the language of change, which appeared in an earlier issue of JOCM (Vol. 14, 2001).While applauding any attempt to develop an appreciation of the fluidity of the processes and politics of organizational change offers a critical response to the account of the language of change, which was prepared by Butcher and Atkinson. This critical response argues that Butcher and Atkinson's attempt to adjust and correct the language of change produces a rather conservative modelling of both management and organizational dynamics. Taking issue with this analysis argues that: Butcher and Atkinson continue to impoverish our understanding of organizational dynamics because they mix (and muddle) opposing and contradictory accounts of language in an attempt to refine an essentially managerialist change agenda; and their account of organizational dynamics produces a fixed and overly‐stabilized appreciation of change, which restricts and diminishes our understanding of the processes of change.

Keywords

Citation

Collins, D. (2003), "Fixing the language of change? A response", Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 16 No. 5, pp. 584-590. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810310494955

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 2003, MCB UP Limited

Related articles