To read this content please select one of the options below:

Processes and outcomes for acute myocardial infarction patients

Jean‐Christophe Luthi (University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland Health Observatory, Canton of Valais, Switzerland Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA)
William M. McClellan (Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA Georgia Medical Care Foundation, Atlanta, Georgia, USA)
W. Dana Flanders (Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA)
Stephen R. Pitts (Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA)
Bernard Burnand (University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland)

International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance

ISSN: 0952-6862

Article publication date: 19 June 2007

413

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to determine whether process quality indicators for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) one associated with outcome indicators (hospital mortality and early readmission).

Design/methodology/approach

A retrospective cohort study was conducted among patients discharged from three Swiss university hospitals with a primary or secondary International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD‐10) AMI code in 1999. A total of 1,129 patients' records were abstructed. Demographic characteristics and risk factors at admission were recorded. The main ECG and laboratory findings were further abstracted as well as hospital and discharge management and treatment. The main outcome measure was process quality indicators derived from evidence‐based guidelines, and hospital mortality and early readmissions.

Findings

After exclusions, 577 patients with AMI were eligible for this study. The mean (SD) age was 68.2 (13.9). In the assessment of quality indicators patients with potential contra‐indications were excluded. Among cohorts of “ideal candidates” for specific interventions, aspirin was not prescribed within 24 hours after admission in 33 (6.2 percent) patients. Among those, 17 (51.5 percent) died (p<0.0001). The adjusted OR for no aspirin after admission was 3.61 (95 percent CI 1.11‐11.77) for hospital mortality. Further, 78 (19.5 percent) patients did not receive β‐blockers at discharge. Among them nine (11.5 percent) were readmitted (p=0.133). The adjusted OR for no β‐blockers at discharge was 2.15 (95 percent CI 0.86‐5.41) for readmissions. Among patients with AMI, not prescribing aspirin within 24 hours after admission was associated with hospital mortality. However, process indicators derived from evidence‐based guidelines were not related to early readmission in this study.

Originality/value

The paper stresses the importance of clinicians confronting their decisions with recommendations of evidence‐based guidelines for the management and treatment of AMI patients.

Keywords

Citation

Luthi, J., McClellan, W.M., Dana Flanders, W., Pitts, S.R. and Burnand, B. (2007), "Processes and outcomes for acute myocardial infarction patients", International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 346-357. https://doi.org/10.1108/09526860710754415

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2007, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles